All posts in TTC

The great TTC

Sunday August 24th 2016

TTC information host, why cut funds to public service that understands it needs to go this far.

Video of Metrolinx Davenport Diamond Meeting: 2016-04-27

Metrolinx Davenport Diamond Meeting: 2016-04-27

Published on Apr 28, 2016

A mostly complete video of Metrolinx’s meeting regarding the Davenport Diamond Grade Separation on April 27 2016, at St. Sebastien Catholic School 

by Vic Gedris.

TTC Relief Line – a new subway line report

The City of Toronto’s City Planning Division and the to link downtown with the Bloor-Danforth Subway east of the Don River.
Report on the development of Toronto’s transit network plan
A staff report on the development of Toronto’s transit network plan is being presented to the City’s Execuitve Committee on March 9. This report recommends that the City
Approve Pape to Downtown via Queen/Richmond as the preferred corridor for the Relief Line project

For more information about the corridor analysis and to provide your feedback, please visit the project webpage.

City staff report are the Continue reading link

Continue Reading →

Elsewhere: London’s lost Tube stations to see commercial revival

All text

click here to view their video

London’s underground rail system has a long and storied history of being used for tasks other than transporting the city’s millions of residents.

With passenger numbers dwindling, Down Street Station closed more than 80 years ago, only to become the corridors of power during the second world war.

Twenty metres below ground and safe from German air force bombs, Prime Minister Winston Churchill, along with 25 administrative staff and soldiers, used the station to meet his war cabinet and send messages.

In 2015 there is no longer a need for such wartime preparations, but there are plans to once again revive London’s so-called ghost stations with restaurants, art galleries and even a cinema.

Speaking on the plans for Down Street Station, Graeme Craig, commercial director of Transport for London, told Al Jazeera: ”This is a unique space within London. It’s a space not used by passengers since May 1932. …  It’s in the heart of Mayfair – it’s unique location, history, and space.”

Keele St. Traffic ….now and the future

Heading south from under the Keele St.  Canadian Pacific Railway subway just north of Vine Ave, Sunday the 23rd of Feb.  a hole lot of bumper to bumper traffic. From the experience of this the residents of the area will have to adapt themselves for a considerable  new time lag in transverse travel time  along the maim NS Keel St travel route as the new Stockyard Mall opens the bulk of the malls stores

March 3rd the stockyards Second cup opens.


keele st traffic

Britain moves to electrify half rail network – accounting for three-quarters of all traffic


The blog has highlighted the very resonating parts…

From the media release here

….more than half Britain’s rail network will be electrified with electric trains accounting for three-quarters of all traffic.


Once electrification schemes including the Great Western and Midland main lines, Liverpool to Manchester and Preston, the Valley lines in south Wales and the ‘electric spine’ from Southampton docks to the West Midlands and Yorkshire are complete, more than half Britain’s rail network will be electrified with electric trains accounting for three-quarters of all traffic.

Simon Kirby, managing director of Network Rail’s infrastructure projects division, said: “Our work to electrify two thousand track miles represents the biggest programme of rail electrification in a generation and will provide faster, quieter and more reliable journeys for millions of passengers every week while cutting the cost of the railway. 

“Thanks to a firm commitment from government to invest in electrification schemes across the country, we are transforming the railway and providing Britain with a sustainable, world-class transport system that is fit for the future. To deliver this work in the safest and most efficient way possible, we need to make the most of the huge potential within our supply chain.”

Six geographic framework contracts have been awarded, with each having a defined workbank of schemes to be delivered. This approach has been endorsed by the supply chain and industry groups such as the Railway Industry Association.

Simon Kirby continued: “With billions of pounds set to be invested in electrification schemes over the next decade, and with many projects at different stages of development, it is absolutely vital that the supply market gets a clear, consistent message from Network Rail about what the company needs from its supply partners, where and when.

“The framework approach chosen by Network Rail gives suppliers a greater degree of certainty about the company’s pipeline of work and means suppliers can target investment so they have the right people with the right skills in the right parts of the country to deliver schemes which will improve our railway and boost economic growth.”

Sunday evening reading- When brilliance considers urban transport – The HYPERLOOP


Toronto as a city –  the elected members and the public talk, talk, talk about transit, then agree somewhat and  start, then cancel mid construction, well you know the story.

However what if we just jumped ahead to the next obvious transport method, that is what happened when Stephenson’s Rocket came along

We did it before! People were excited in 1977 to view inside the TTC Wychwood Barns to view the exciting and then new fleet of street-cars which ride our street rails.

below is a link to Elon Musk document – released  days ago –  of his HYPERLOOP rail transport idea, the tech is amazing as well as the practical thoughts to get it done.

Hey the Junction Even has an old rail sorting yard to site the terminal!

Link to PDF at SPACE X

Link to PDF at this blog

…a great read, for transit brilliance, OH, and if you are into start-up pitches also educative.

Click image to visit Space X web site

Click image to visit Space X web site


All text below from the space X forward to the article


If we are to make a massive investment in a new transportation system, then the return should by rights be equally massive. Compared to the alternatives, it should ideally be:

• Safer

• Faster

• Lower cost

• More convenient

• Immune to weather

• Sustainably self-powering

• Resistant to Earthquakes

• Not disruptive to those along the route

Is there truly a new mode of transport – a fifth mode after planes, trains, cars and boats – that meets those criteria and is practical to implement? Many ideas for a system with most of those properties have been proposed and should be acknowledged, reaching as far back as Robert Goddard’s to proposals in recent decades by the Rand Corporation and ET3.

Unfortunately, none of these have panned out. As things stand today, there is not even a short distance demonstration system operating in test pilot mode anywhere in the world, let alone something that is robust enough for public transit. They all possess, it would seem, one or more fatal flaws that prevent them from coming to fruition.

The links again

Link to PDF at SPACE X

Link to PDF at this blog

Private money for Quebec’s roads, via Financial Post. oh and Ontario stuff too

Picture credit - woodleywonderworks click image to visit his Flickr site

Picture credit – woodleywonderworks click image to visit his Flickr site

Full article here at the Financial Post.

A simple post of a article hat highlights the similar  road issues Toronto has and possible methods to pay for the repair and replacement of our crumbing roads.

…all excerpts below from the article, much more in the complete article.

The sheer size of those needs, combined with a diminishing capacity to pay for it with public money, may speed up private sector involvement in the province unlike anything seen before in Canada.

“We believe this year is going to be a game-changer,” said Vincent Joli-Coeur, vice-chairman of National Bank Financial, which has participated in several major infrastructure financings including the bond sale for Montreal’s $2.6-billion CHUM hospital redevelopment. “In the past, we used to be able to spend years discussing new ways of [project procurement and funding]. Now it’s imminent.”


The only question is just how creative Quebec will get with its funding solutions. Mr. Joli-Coeur believes necessity will push the province to bring in private investors such as pension plans to fund things that were previously unthinkable, including public transit development.

“Public transit, in our view as financiers, is the next frontier,” he said. “It’s never been financed in the private sector in Canada.”

Ontario, too, wants to undertake a massive public transit expansion in the Toronto-Hamilton area. To pay for it, a government-appointed advisory panel in December recommended raising existing gasoline taxes as much as 10¢ per litre to 24.7¢ and weighing an increase in the province’s harmonized sales tax. The panel also discussed increasing corporate taxes and using a mechanism known as “land value capture,” which would collect part of the increase in the value of land located near new transit lines.

Most of those solutions wouldn’t fly in Quebec without drawing significant public protest. Quebec motorists already pay 22.2¢ per-litre in gas tax, and with salaries barely budging year-over-year, people won’t want to pay much more. Meanwhile, the government already increased its provincial sales tax in both 2011 and 2012.

“Most of the revenue tools [being contemplated] by Ontario to finance public transit will have a hard time being sold in Quebec,” Mr. Joli-Coeur said. “The conventional ways of doing things … has to change.”


Take Hong Kong. The city’s Mass Transit Railway Corp. (MTR) carries five million passengers every weekday over 218 kilometres of rail lines, offering its customers things other transit systems only dream of: 3-G and free wi-fi telecommunications service for passengers, public computers, library book drops, elevators down to track-level, and first-class cars on longer routes. It’s one of the few transit agencies anywhere that actually makes money.

“If the infrastructure is not self-sustaining, it cannot rely on public funding always being there,” MTR chief executive Jay Walder told an audience last year at Harvard University. “At some point politics simply diverts the money elsewhere.”


The thinking in all of these mechanisms is that expanding transit boosts the value of property near the transit lines, and that those who benefit from that should contribute to the cost. The tricky part, however, lies in how to go about it. Tax businesses too much and you risk scaring them away. Ask too little and you don’t generate enough money to fund your projects.

“The development community are not adverse to participating in the cost of certain transportation investments because they know that they are the beneficiary,” said Blake Hutcheson, chief executive of Oxford Properties, the real estate investment arm of pension fund manager OMERS. “The difficulty is how do you get at that, how do you quantify it?”

Oxford Properties is involved in a separate real-estate/transit development project in Manhattan called Hudson Yards.


Kathleen Wynne says….Tolls, taxes the only way to pay for transit

…extracted from a Toronto Star interview

Wynne, however, did highlight what the city of Los Angeles did in 2008 with “a dedicated, 30-year, 0.5-per cent regional sales tax, which is expected to pour approximately $40 billion into their transit expansion effort.”

“They recognized the problem, they came up with a plan that was right for them and they took action,” the premier said, noting potential solutions may also be found in Europe.

She also pointed to Stockholm, Sweden, where in 2006 officials began charging congestion tolls based on the time of day in a six-month experiment.

“During that same period, they increased the availability of public transit. Six months later, the improvements to commuter travel times were even better than expected. There was a measurable, positive impact on Stockholm’s air quality and on the downtown economy,” she said.

“The trial also had a positive impact on traffic in the whole region, not just within the city limits. And Stockholm citizens overwhelmingly supported keeping the toll.”

Unbelievable effort and a gift to our city – EDWARD J. LEVY – Toronto-focused rapid transit book (free)



Visit site via this link


DOWNLOAD & PRINT site link  in section or whole

When I started work on this history, my intention was straightforward: to create a comprehensive record of Toronto-focused rapid transit planning documents prepared since the vision of a rapid transit network was first articulated more than a century ago. I planned to arrange the major reports, monographs, maps, and articles chronologically and supplement each one with a brief commentary. It was not to be a history complete with secondary sources and a wealth of background detail and context, but a record of primary documents on a common theme, arranged and annotated for the interested reader.

I wanted to demonstrate the astounding volume of analytic work done, and to contrast this output with the relatively meagre achievements to date on (or under) the ground. The idea arose from my own frustration after more than 50 years of professional involvement in advocacy, planning, and design relating to public transit and from the realization that in so many ways, my efforts, and those of many colleagues, have been and continue to be in vain.

My task soon proved to be far more complicated and onerous than I had initially envisaged. What was to be a mere compilation of key documents threatened to become a voluminous historical epic replete with an array of technical visions ranging from the overambitious to the niggardly, mirroring changes in political and fiscal circumstances throughout the period. Moreover, I was finding it increasingly difficult to devise a logical point at which to end the narrative, because new initiatives and variations were continually emerging from the bureaucracy, its advisors, and various interest groups. I also found it difficult to refrain from including my own comments on the merits of the various plans and on the decisions of those who were presented with those plans.

Certain core concepts relating to primary public transit service continually recurred in my research, such as the need for major transit routes to follow the arterial corridors originally created by the rectilinear grid typical of the British survey and land subdivision system dating back to 18th-century Upper Canada. This system in turn dictated the form and growth pattern of the future urban area, and in so doing also dictated the configuration of primary public transit services. The relationships between planning and infrastructure made sense before the era of underground railways, when all communal transportation services were necessarily confined to public road rights-of-way (with the exception of railways).

When the idea of subways emerged in Toronto early in the 20th century, the decision to keep the underground lines as shallow as possible to avoid the cost of deep tunnelling and deep stations (and thereby minimize overall trip duration) essentially meant that the lines would either follow or closely parallel the arterial corridors of the primary grid, such as Yonge Street and the Bloor-Danforth corridor. [1]

In the end, I found that the basic characteristics of the rapid transit system were established and later confirmed and refined by way of a relatively small number of key planning initiatives. Indeed, I have concluded that there were only four breakthroughs in the history of general and transportation planning for Toronto and its region:

  1. Initial concepts for the primary north-south corridor (Yonge-Bay) as well as important east-west corridors (King, Queen, Bloor-Danforth) during the period 1909–1915.
  2. The series of studies undertaken for the Province of Ontario relating to the Metropolitan Toronto Planning Area and neighbouring counties (prior to the formation of the Regional Municipalities) known as the Metropolitan Toronto and Region Transportation Study (MTARTS) during the period 1962–1968.
  3. The monumental series of study reports constituting the Metropolitan Toronto Transportation Plan Review (MTTPR) issued during the period 1973–1975. Among the topics documented was the importance of expanding the rapid transit system into anetwork serving the city’s central area with lines oriented in all cardinal directions, including an early concept for the Downtown Relief Line or downtown “U”-shaped distributor; and an east-west line serving the burgeoning upper-midtown districts of Metropolitan Toronto following the Eglinton arterial corridor.
  4. The profusely documented Regional Transportation Study (“The Big Move”) produced by Metrolinx (initially the Greater Toronto Area/Hamilton Transportation Authority), for the Province of Ontario, during the period 2007–2008.

All else is really a series of politically constrained “footnotes,” generated by or on behalf of successive municipal government agencies and advisors in almost invariably futile attempts to win sustained fiscal support from senior governments.

In putting this information on the web, I hope to remind decision-makers and others of the many important ideas that have been proposed over the years that are still relevant in 21stcentury Toronto. May good sense leading to firm political and fiscal support ultimately lead to the creation of the transportation network that this fast-growing conurbation so desperately needs.

Edward J. Levy, P.Eng. Toronto, Ontario

February 20, 2013

further info from the site

In summarizing the 100‐year history of rapid transit planning and development in the Toronto area using maps and interpretive text, I will emphasize the recurring concept of an enhanced central area rapid transit network. In doing so, I hope to make the strongest possible case for creating such a network within the City of

I should explain that I do not consider the terms “system” and “network” synonyms, and I have been careful to avoid using them as such.

  • system is an arrangement of two or more lines that intersect at either a single interchange station (or at two which are very close to one another), resulting in little route redundancy; that is, a means by which riders could follow alternative routes to their destinations to bypass closures caused by service disruptions or emergencies on specific route segments. Rapid transit systems typically offer less‐than‐optimum area coverage and average journey time, and in general, lack operational robustness in terms of service flexibility and balanced demand/capacity relationships.
  • network is an arrangement of two or more lines that meet at two or more spatially well distributed interchange stations, thereby providing route redundancy, resulting in effective passenger load balance on pairs of parallel lines, providing enhanced area coverage and options for bypassing service disruptions. A network is robust in that it allows for not only operational flexibility, but also for growth, change, and progressive land use diversification – all essential for a successful and expanding major urban area such as the Toronto region.

Virtually all major cities that have rapid transit enjoy network service, although a few lack certain characteristics. Toronto, however, has a system, not a network: Bloor/Yonge station is the key interchange between the two most heavily used lines, and as such is a point of particular vulnerability in terms of service disruption on the entire system.

A true network, as opposed to the existing skeletal system, would provide more well‐distributed interchange opportunities, and sufficient capacity to handle future travel demand in several currently underserved key corridors across the City of Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area. The current practice of providing inadequate numbers of “replacement buses” during line closures leads to operational chaos as well as rider (and staff) frustration. This situation can only worsen as the more heavily built‐up parts of the urban area (particularly the historic centre) continue to diversify and add population and jobs.

The evolution of a network would involve supplementing existing subway services (essentially the oldest, most underdesigned sections of the system) with strategically planned new lines. Analyses carried out over many decades clearly indicate that the initial additions should include links between the Financial District and the northeast and northwest districts of the city. The rapidly regenerating districts immediately east and west of the financial district, as well as the burgeoning central waterfront, would also be served by such a “U”‐shaped distributor alignment. In addition to the distributor, an east‐west line in the Eglinton corridor would be an essential northern section of an expanded central area network.

Initially, the new lines (forming a circumferential loop configuration) could take the form of “pre-metro” facilities; i.e., grade-separated lines designed at the outset for LRT (light rapid transit, or enhanced streetcar) operation, served by relatively short platforms, designed for eventual upgrading to accommodate conventional high‐capacity subway service, without the need for wholesale reconstruction or expansion of stations and tunnels.[1]

After much debate by Toronto City Council, it has been decided to make the Eglinton Crosstown line into a light rail transit line rather than a full subway. Unfortunately, the Eglinton line is not being designed as a “pre‐metro” that could be converted later to full subway (heavy rapid transit) operation without having to substantially rebuild the stations, turnouts, pocket (storage) tracks, etc., even though a design that could ultimately handle wider subway rolling stock could be provided at the outset without greatly increasing the capital budget. As things now stand, however, any hope of future conversion would likely be too disruptive and costly to carry out. Many areas along Eglinton Avenue have the potential for intensified redevelopment in conjunction with the construction of the tunnel, and this once‐in‐a‐century opportunity could well be hobbled by inadequate line capacity during its operating life.

ELSEWARE …winners of high speed rail comp

ELSEWARE is going to be a part of the blog  posting links to articles with similar happenings in the Junction.

This one is about a completion to discuss and provide ideas about high speed rail as as the  West Toronto Diamond project.


Click on the image to go to the site.

click on the image to go to the site, this author really enjoyed the HOU(S)TATION configures a new suburban morphology founded on the logics of high-speed rail. article and the The Effect of High-Speed Rail on Six Lives proposes an ad campaign aimed at the high-speed rail public. By demonstrating the diverse set of people who could benefit from HSR, the project reminds us how personal transportation really is article.

Road issues about the Junction

Has anyone else noticed the incredibly rough and probably car damaging and people tripping state of the side street roads in the junction.

It’s common knowledge the city has a monetary road fixing crises

Maybe it’s tome for a road repair only tax?

St Clair Avenue West Streetcar Transit opens again

Thanks to blog readers JJ and RS for bringing this to the blogs attention

The Gunn's Ave loop during reconstruction

City Council – Light Rail Vehicles meeting today and a great background post about the issue at

Over at a blog about transit and politics there is a great post about

How Many Streetcars Do We Need?

an excerpt…

Recent comments by Adam Giambrone, Chair of the TTC, suggest that 30 to 40 percent of the streetcar fleet is out of service in the shops, and that bus substitution will be required on some routes come the fall.

Those of us who follow the TTC have been waiting for a definitive fleet plan for some time, and hope to see one, finally, in the July Commission Meeting Agenda.  [link to full post]

Info on the city meeting about the issue today.

City Council Agenda – Meeting 37 (Notice of Meeting)

  • CC37.1 – report (June 25, 2009) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, headed “Purchase of 204 Light Rail Vehicles (LRVs) – TTC Capital Funding”
    Background Information

TTC hands Dundas West subway station alternate exit reponsibilty to Metrolinx and Go Transit


Photo credit    onshi

Photo credit (adapted from ) onshi

The Dundas St.  West subway station identified as a priority in a Fire and Life Safety Assessment Study completed in 2002, as requiring an alternate means of egress from the station platform has had the responsibility for this  second exit issue tranfered to Metrolinx and GO Transit by the TTC.

from the city report…

Dundas West Station:

The second exit concept was being developed by GO Transit as part of their plans for a new connection to the station. The concept included an automatic entrance to permit a direct connection between Dundas West Station and GO Station. The project has been recently handed over to Metrolinx and discussions are on-going with Metrolinx and GO Transit to pursue this option including cost sharing arrangements  [Full TTC report opens in new window from TTC ] [Full TTC report opens in new window from archive on this site]

Should the Dundas West Station have a proper – weather protected – traffic avoiding direct link to the the GO station? The new air link go rail effort will pass right though the area only 350 meters away.

the route now from subway to Go station  in the TTC’s own text… (2004 numbers)

In order to transfer between the TTC Dundas West Station on the Bloor-Danforth Subway and the GO Bloor Station on the Georgetown line, customers walk approximately 350 metres along Bloor Street, between the two stations. Based on the most-recent GO passenger surveys, approximately 100 passengers per day, in each direction, use the GO Bloor Station, which represents less than 2% of the 6,900 total daily inbound passengers on the Georgetown line. Very few of these passengers currently transfer between TTC and GO services at this location.

also from their 2004 report

The proposed rail link between downtown Toronto and Pearson Airport, recently announced by the Federal government, would operate in the current GO Transit Georgetown corridor, and is premised, in part, on an improved connection with TTC at Dundas West Station.

Related info link to the city PDF file of the Bloor Dundas Avenue Study outlining the planning uses for the area of the subway. [link]